• Microvascular research · Nov 1999

    A new view of Starling's hypothesis at the microstructural level.

    • X Hu and S Weinbaum.
    • Department of Mechanical Engineering, The City College of The City University of New York, New York, New York 10031, USA.
    • Microvasc. Res. 1999 Nov 1;58(3):281-304.

    AbstractIn this paper we quantitatively investigate the hypothesis proposed by Michel (Exp. Physiol. 82, 1-30, 1997) and Weinbaum (Ann. Biomed. Eng. 26, 1-17, 1998) that the Starling forces are determined by the local difference in the hydrostatic and colloid osmotic pressure across the endothelial surface glycocalyx, which we propose is the primary molecular sieve for plasma proteins, rather than the global difference in the hydrostatic and oncotic pressure across the capillary wall between the plasma and tissue, as has been universally assumed until now. A spatially heterogeneous microstructural model is developed to explain at the cellular level why there is oncotic absorption at low capillary pressures in the short-lived transient experiments of Michel and Phillips (J. Physiol. 388, 421-435, 1987) on frog mesentery capillary, but a small positive filtration once a steady state is achieved. The new model also predicts that the local protein concentration behind the surface glycocalyx can differ greatly from the tissue protein concentration, since the convective flux of proteins through the orifice-like pores in the junction strand will greatly impede the back diffusion of the proteins into the lumen side of the cleft when the local Peclet number at the orifice is >1. The net result is that the filtration in the capillaries is far less than heretofore realized and there may be no need for venous reabsorption.Copyright 1999 Academic Press.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…