• Midwifery · Dec 2003

    A qualitative study of information about available options for childbirth venue and pregnant women's preference for a place of delivery.

    • Banyana Cecilia Madi and Rosemary Crow.
    • Department of Social Statistics, University of Southampton, Highfield, SO17 1BJ Southampton, UK. bcm@socsci.soton.ac.uk
    • Midwifery. 2003 Dec 1;19(4):328-36.

    AimTo explore the level of information about possible venues for childbirth among pregnant women, and to establish the midwives' involvement in giving information and helping women to make choices about where they want to give birth.DesignQualitative study using tape-recorded unstructured interviews.SettingThe South East of England.Participants33 pregnant women; 20 planning a hospital birth and 13 planning a home birth recruited between 32 and 42 weeks of pregnancy.FindingsWomen planning a home birth were well informed about the options available to them, while the majority of those planning a hospital birth were less informed about the availability of home birth and assumed that the hospital was the only option. Midwives did not initiate the discussion of availability of home birth but supported those who already knew and asked for it.ConclusionsAlmost a decade after the adoption of Changing Childbirth (DoH 1993) recommendations as policy in England there is still evidence of lack of information among pregnant women regarding services available to them. In this study the midwives' reluctance to inform women about home birth as a possible venue for childbirth, has been demonstrated.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.