• J Cardiovasc Magn Reson · Jan 2012

    Comparative Study

    Cardiac output and cardiac index measured with cardiovascular magnetic resonance in healthy subjects, elite athletes and patients with congestive heart failure.

    • Marcus Carlsson, Ruslana Andersson, Karin Markenroth Bloch, Katarina Steding-Ehrenborg, Henrik Mosén, Freddy Stahlberg, Bjorn Ekmehag, and Hakan Arheden.
    • Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, BFC, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, SE-22185, Sweden. marcus.carlsson@med.lu.se
    • J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2012 Jan 1;14:51.

    BackgroundCardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (CMR) enables non-invasive quantification of cardiac output (CO) and thereby cardiac index (CI, CO indexed to body surface area). The aim of this study was to establish if CI decreases with age and compare the values to CI for athletes and for patients with congestive heart failure (CHF).MethodsCI was measured in 144 healthy volunteers (39 ± 16 years, range 21-81 years, 68 females), in 60 athletes (29 ± 6 years, 30 females) and in 157 CHF patients with ejection fraction (EF) below 40% (60 ± 13 years, 33 females). CI was calculated using aortic flow by velocity-encoded CMR and is presented as mean ± SD. Flow was validated in vitro using a flow phantom and in 25 subjects with aorta and pulmonary flow measurements.ResultsThere was a slight decrease of CI with age in healthy subjects (8 ml/min/m² per year, r² = 0.07, p = 0.001). CI in males (3.2 ± 0.5 l/min/m²) and females (3.1 ± 0.4 l/min/m²) did not differ (p = 0.64). The mean ± SD of CI in healthy subjects in the age range of 20-29 was 3.3 ± 0.4 l/min/m², in 30-39 years 3.3 ± 0.5 l/min/m², in 40-49 years 3.1 ± 0.5 l/min/m², 50-59 years 3.0 ± 0.4 l/min/m² and >60 years 3.0 ± 0.4 l/min/m². There was no difference in CI between athletes and age-controlled healthy subjects but HR was lower and indexed SV higher in athletes. CI in CHF patients (2.3 ± 0.6 l/min/m²) was lower compared to the healthy population (p < 0.001). There was a weak correlation between CI and EF in CHF patients (r² = 0.07, p < 0.001) but CI did not differ between patients with NYHA-classes I-II compared to III-IV (n = 97, p = 0.16) or patients with or without hospitalization in the previous year (n = 100, p = 0.72). In vitro phantom validation showed low bias (-0.8 ± 19.8 ml/s) and in vivo validation in 25 subjects also showed low bias (0.26 ± 0.61 l/min, QP/QS 1.04 ± 0.09) between pulmonary and aortic flow.ConclusionsCI decreases in healthy subjects with age but does not differ between males and females. We found no difference in CI between athletes and healthy subjects at rest but CI was lower in patients with congestive heart failure. The presented values can be used as reference values for flow velocity mapping CMR.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.