• Fetal. Diagn. Ther. · Nov 1999

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial

    Initiating extradural analgesia during labour: comparison of three different bupivacaine concentrations used as the loading dose.

    • C Harms, M Siegemund, S C Marsch, D V Surbek, I Hösli, and M C Schneider.
    • Department of Anaesthesia, University of Basel, Kantonsspital, Basel, Switzerland. harms@ubaclu.unibas.ch
    • Fetal. Diagn. Ther. 1999 Nov 1;14(6):368-74.

    ObjectivePotential effects of extradural analgesia on the progress of labour and obstetric outcome are still a matter of concern and the focus of ongoing debates. Despite this, little attention is paid to the initiation of extradural labour analgesia. The objective of this prospective, randomized, double-blind trial was to identify the optimal of three concentrations of bupivacaine used as a loading bolus for initiating extradural analgesia during labour.MethodsSixty-seven full-term parturients requesting extradural analgesia received either bupivacaine 0.25% (group A), 0.125% (group B) or 0. 0625% (group C). Bupivacaine administration was titrated to achieve a pain score ResultsThe probability of obtaining a VAS pain score /=1 based on using a modified Bromage scoring scale. There were no differences in incidence of maternal hypotension, ephedrine requirements, foetal heart rate abnormalities, mode of delivery and neonatal outcome.ConclusionsOf the three concentrations used in this clinical setting, 0.125% was the most suitable concentration of plain bupivacaine to initiate extradural analgesia in labour. Using 0.25% bupivacaine increased the incidence of motor block, whereas for 0.0625% plain bupivacaine the probability to achieve adequate analgesia was unacceptably low.Copyright 1999 S. Karger AG, Basel

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.