-
Int J Obstet Anesth · Apr 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialAnalgesia produced by epidural diamorphine is better following caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia than under epidural anaesthesia.
- B J Norman and S Yentis.
- Magill Department of Anaesthesia, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK.
- Int J Obstet Anesth. 1998 Apr 1; 7 (2): 98-102.
AbstractIn a randomized double-blind study, the efficacy, duration of action and side-effects of epidural diamorphine 2.5 mg in 10 ml normal saline were compared following elective caesarean section under either spinal anaesthesia (using a combined spinal epidural technique, n = 32) or conventional epidural anaesthesia (n = 26). Median visual analogue pain scores were consistently lower in patients who had received spinal anaesthesia and this reached significance at 24 h (P = 0.02). If additional i.m. morphine was required, the mean (SD) time to its administration was significantly greater following spinal anaesthesia (12.6 h (5.9)) than epidural anaesthesia (6.6 h (3.1), P = 0.01). The incidence of side-effects was similar in the two groups. The improved analgesia following spinal anaesthesia is another advantage of the combined spinal epidural technique over conventional epidural anaesthesia for elective caesarean section.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*,_underline_or**bold**. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>and subscript<sub>text</sub>. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3., hyphens-or asterisks*. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com) - Images can be included with:
 - For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote..