• Pain · Mar 1986

    Review

    A hypothesis on the physiological basis for causalgia and related pains.

    • W J Roberts.
    • Pain. 1986 Mar 1;24(3):297-311.

    AbstractA hypothesis is presented concerning the neuronal mechanisms which subserve the sympathetically maintained pains such as causalgia and reflex sympathetic dystrophy. The hypothesis rests on two assumptions: that a high rate of firing in spinal wide-dynamic-range (WDR) or multireceptive neurons results in painful sensations; and that nociceptor responses associated with trauma can produce long-term sensitization of WDR neurons. The hypothesis states that chronic sympathetically maintained pains are mediated by activity in low-threshold, myelinated mechanoreceptors, that this afferent activity results from sympathetic efferent actions upon the receptors or upon afferent fibers ending in a neuroma and that these afferent fibers evoke sufficient activity in sensitized spinal WDR neurons to produce a painful sensation. This hypothesis is based on known characteristics of these neuronal populations studied in experimental animals and on the observed sensory disturbances reported in patients successfully treated with sympathetic blocks. This hypothesis does not require nerve injury or dystrophic tissue. It explains both the continuous pain and the allodynia that are common to these syndromes and their abolition by sympathetic block. Specific changes are proposed in the diagnosis and treatment of post-traumatic pains.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.