• Lisa Marr, Devon Neale, Venita Wolfe, and Judith Kitzes.
• Division of Geriatrics, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131-0001, USA. lmarr@salud.unm.edu
• J Palliat Med. 2012 Jan 1;15(1):71-6.

BackgroundRecent end-of-life (EOL) care literature in non-Native American (NA) populations has demonstrated the benefits of EOL discussions. EOL discussions are associated with less aggressive care at EOL, better patient self-assessed quality of life, and less caregiver depression after the patient is deceased. There is no literature assessing these issues in NA populations. However, common myths that may affect care include: 1) NA patients will not discuss death and dying, 2) severely ill NA patients and families will not choose do not resuscitate (DNR) status, and 3) NA patients and families will not utilize hospice services if offered.MethodsOur study explored these issues utilizing a consultation database from the Palliative Care Consultation Service at University of New Mexico Hospital (UNMH). Statistical analyses were conducted using nonparametric Wilcoxon tests for continuous variables and Fisher's exact test for categorical variables.Results And ConclusionStudy results demonstrate that health care providers can hold EOL care discussions with NA patients and NA patients' care preferences are affected by these discussions. The result do not support our hypothesis that there would be a lower rate of post-consult DNR status in NA patients (compared with non-NA). NA and non-NA patients and families participated in family meetings and their code status was affected to a similar degree. Furthermore, NA patients and their families choose hospice services at rates similar to non-NA patients seen by the palliative care consultation service.

19 keywords...

hide…