• Air medical journal · Apr 1998

    The quick look airway classification. A useful tool in predicting the difficult out-of-hospital intubation: experience in an air medical transport program.

    • R Duchynski, K Brauer, K Hutton, S Jones, and P Rosen.
    • Golden Hour Data Systems, San Diego, CA, USA.
    • Air Med. J. 1998 Apr 1;17(2):46-50.

    AbstractThe unpredictable nature of the out-of-hospital care environment poses unique challenges for active airway management techniques. This descriptive study was conducted in the helicopter air medical transport (AMT) environment for a period of 32 months to determine whether initial direct airway visualization classification may provide a useful tool to predict the difficulty of intubation. Data extracted from documented oral intubation attempts included initial airway visualization grade, number of attempts, final airway management method, and procedural complications. Oral intubation was attempted on 429 patients. Initial airway visualization grades were found with the following frequency for grades I through IV: 65.6%, 21.5%, 8.6%, and 5.4%, respectively. Similarly, the average number of attempts was 1.34, 1.65, 1.97, and 2.39, respectively. The serious complication rate was 24%, 46%, 62%, and 65%, respectively. A statistically significant correlation (Spearman's rho) was found between increasing grade and both the number of intubation attempts (0.52) and the number of complications (0.45). Initial visualization classification may serve as a useful indicator in the out-of-hospital environment to help anticipate the difficulty of intubation and the need for early alternative airway management strategies. In this program, such classification is used to monitor airway management skills.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…