• Chelsea S Kidwell, Julio A Chalela, Jeffrey L Saver, Sidney Starkman, Michael D Hill, Andrew M Demchuk, John A Butman, Nicholas Patronas, Jeffry R Alger, Lawrence L Latour, Marie L Luby, Alison E Baird, Megan C Leary, Margaret Tremwel, Bruce Ovbiagele, Andre Fredieu, Shuichi Suzuki, J Pablo Villablanca, Stephen Davis, Billy Dunn, Jason W Todd, Mustapha A Ezzeddine, Joseph Haymore, John K Lynch, Lisa Davis, and Steven Warach.
• UCLA Stroke Center, Los Angeles, Calif, USA. ckidwell@ucla.edu
• JAMA. 2004 Oct 20;292(15):1823-30.

ContextNoncontrast computed tomography (CT) is the standard brain imaging study for the initial evaluation of patients with acute stroke symptoms. Multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been proposed as an alternative to CT in the emergency stroke setting. However, the accuracy of MRI relative to CT for the detection of hyperacute intracerebral hemorrhage has not been demonstrated.ObjectiveTo compare the accuracy of MRI and CT for detection of acute intracerebral hemorrhage in patients presenting with acute focal stroke symptoms.Design, Setting, And PatientsA prospective, multicenter study was performed at 2 stroke centers (UCLA Medical Center and Suburban Hospital, Bethesda, Md), between October 2000 and February 2003. Patients presenting with focal stroke symptoms within 6 hours of onset underwent brain MRI followed by noncontrast CT.Main Outcome MeasuresAcute intracerebral hemorrhage and any intracerebral hemorrhage diagnosed on gradient recalled echo (GRE) MRI and CT scans by a consensus of 4 blinded readers.ResultsThe study was stopped early, after 200 patients were enrolled, when it became apparent at the time of an unplanned interim analysis that MRI was detecting cases of hemorrhagic transformation not detected by CT. For the diagnosis of any hemorrhage, MRI was positive in 71 patients with CT positive in 29 (P<.001). For the diagnosis of acute hemorrhage, MRI and CT were equivalent (96% concordance). Acute hemorrhage was diagnosed in 25 patients on both MRI and CT. In 4 other patients, acute hemorrhage was present on MRI but not on the corresponding CT--each of these 4 cases was interpreted as hemorrhagic transformation of an ischemic infarct. In 3 patients, regions interpreted as acute hemorrhage on CT were interpreted as chronic hemorrhage on MRI. In 1 patient, subarachnoid hemorrhage was diagnosed on CT but not on MRI. In 49 patients, chronic hemorrhage, most often microbleeds, was visualized on MRI but not on CT.ConclusionMRI may be as accurate as CT for the detection of acute hemorrhage in patients presenting with acute focal stroke symptoms and is more accurate than CT for the detection of chronic intracerebral hemorrhage.

16 keywords...

hide…