• Christian Bahrs, Bernd Rolauffs, Fabian Stuby, Klaus Dietz, Kuno Weise, and Peter Helwig.
• BG Trauma Center, Hospital for Traumatology and Reconstructive Surgery, Eberhard-Karls-University, Tuebingen, Germany.
• J Trauma. 2010 Oct 1;69(4):901-6.

BackgroundThis study examined the effect of proximal humeral fractures on the age- and shoulder-specific prevalence of rotator cuff tears (RCTs) as well as the association with fracture severity, patient age, and clinical outcome.MethodsSixty-three fractures were treated conservatively; in 114 cases, minimally invasive osteosynthesis, and in 125 cases, open reduction and plate fixation were performed without rotator cuff reconstruction. After 4.4 years, all 302 patients were clinically and sonographically examined.ResultsWe examined 139 two-part, 95 three-part, and 68 four-part fractures according to Neer and 134 A, 86 B, and 82 C fractures according to the AO classification. There were 52 patients (17%) with a complete rotator tear (RCT) only at the injured shoulder and 11 patients (4%) with a complete RCT only at the contralateral shoulder (p < 0.0001). Independent of the patient's age at follow-up, the prevalence of an RCT in the fractured shoulder was 13% higher than the prevalence in the opposite shoulder. Four-part fractures showed a significant association with a complete RCT (p = 0.047).Of 74 patients with a satisfactory or poor Constant Score, 33 (44.6%) had RCTs. In the remaining 228 patients with a good to excellent result, only 26 (11.4%) had RCTs. We showed that 66% of the RCTs observed at the fractured shoulder were caused by trauma. There was no association between treatment modality and a complete RCT.ConclusionRCTs may need special attention in initial diagnostics, management, and follow-up especially in severe proximal humeral fractures.

29 keywords...

hide…