• Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim · Aug 1998

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial

    [Effect of a 3-in-1 block in arthroscopic knee surgery. Comparative study with subarachnoid block].

    • X Sala-Blanch, J R Lázaro, E Otero, J Gómez-Bonfills, and A el-Mezil.
    • Servicio de Anestesiología y Reanimación, Hospital de Sant Boi, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Barcelona.
    • Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 1998 Aug 1;45(7):275-9.

    Hypothesis And ObjectivesTrunk blockades in arthroscopic knee surgery are rarely performed because combined blockade of the sciatic and lumbar plexus nerves are required, particularly if ischemia is required. We aimed to assess the efficacy of the "3-in-1 block" combined with intraarticular infiltration of local anesthetic for arthroscopic meniscectomy. The results were compared with our standard technique, subarachnoid anesthesia.Patients And MethodsForty ASA I-II patients undergoing arthroscopic meniscectomy without ischemia. The patients were randomly assigned to receive "3-in-1 block" with 40 mL of 1.5% mepivacaine (T group, n = 20), or the standard technique of subarachnoid puncture with 3 mL of 2% lidocaine (S group, n = 20). Twenty minutes after puncture patients in both groups received intraarticular injections of 20 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% with 1:200,000 adrenaline in the knee. Surgery began 10 minutes later. We assessed requirements for sedation during surgery, degree of satisfaction during surgery according to the surgeon and the patient, hemodynamic variables at predetermined times, postoperative pain (on a verbal scale and related to consumption of analgesics in the first 48 hours after surgery), and the appearance of side effects attributable to anesthetic technique.ResultsDemographic variables were comparable in the two groups and no surgical events were recorded. Eighteen patients in the T group and one in the S group required sedation during surgery (p < 0.05). Blood pressure was significantly lower in the S group than in the T group (p < 0.05). No patient in the T group required atropine and/or ephedrine during surgery, whereas 5 patients in the S group did (p < 0.05). Postoperative evolution was similar in the two groups. No postoperative complications attributable to the techniques were recorded.ConclusionsThe "3-in-1 block" combined with joint infiltration of local anesthetics may be an effective alternative when subarachnoid anesthesia is contraindicated in patients undergoing arthroscopic meniscectomy.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.