• Y Liu, L Tao, X Wang, H Cui, X Chen, and B Ji.
• Department of Cardiopulmonary Bypass, Wuhan Asia Heart Hospital, Wuhan 430022, Peoples R China.
• Perfusion. 2012 Jan 1;27(1):83-9.

BackgroundIn this study, we assessed clinical results by using a minimal extracorporeal circuit (MECC) and compared it to a conventional cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) system in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) procedures.Methods And MaterialsFrom August to October 2006, forty consecutive patients undergoing isolated CABG procedures were randomly assigned to either a miniaturized closed circuit CPB with the Maquet-Cardiopulmonary MECC system (Group M, n=20) or to a conventional CPB system (Group C, n=20). Clinical outcomes were observed before, during and after the operation. Besides evaluating the perioperative clinical data, serial blood venous samples were obtained after induction, 30 minutes after CPB initiation, 2h, 6h, 12h, and 24h post-CPB. The focus of our study was on myocardial damage (cTnI), neutrophil and platelet counts, activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and free hemoglobin.ResultsBoth the transfusion of packed red blood cells and fresh frozen plasma were significantly lower in Group M compared to Group C (p<0.05). The levels of cTnI were lower in Group M at 2h, 6h and 12h post-CPB than in Group C (p<0.01). The values of aPTT in Group M recovered to normal levels after surgery, but were prolonged in Group C at early post-CPB and were statistically longer than Group M at 2h, 6h, and 12h post-CPB (p<0.05). The concentrations of free hemoglobin in Group C were higher than in Group M during and post-CPB, and there was a statistical difference at 2h post-CPB (p<0.05).ConclusionIn conclusion, the MECC system is a safe alternative for patients who undertake extracorporeal circulation (ECC) for CABG surgery. Lower transfusion requirements and less damage to red cells may further promote the use of MECC systems, especially in higher risk patients.

20 keywords...

hide…