• Radiother Oncol · Jan 2003

    Analysis of mandibular dose distribution in radiotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer: dosimetric and clinical results in 18 patients.

    • Barbara A Jereczek-Fossa, Cristina Garibaldi, Gianpiero Catalano, Alberto d'Onofrio, Tommaso De Pas, Chiara Bocci, Mario Ciocca, Fiora DePaoli, and Roberto Orecchia.
    • Division of Radiation Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, via Ripamonti 435, 20141, Milan, Italy.
    • Radiother Oncol. 2003 Jan 1;66(1):49-56.

    Background And PurposeThe relationship between the radiation dose and the risk of the osteoradionecrosis is well known. However, the dose to the mandible is not routinely assessed in the radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. The aim of our study was to analyze the mandibular dose distribution in the patients administered curative radiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx. Moreover, the clinical results have been analyzed.Material And MethodsWe examined the clinical records and treatment plans in 18 patients treated with bifractionated radiotherapy for stage II-IV oropharyngeal cancer. In 17 patients, the total radiotherapy dose prescribed in the International Committee of Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) reference point was 74.4 Gy administered in 62 fractions (1.2 Gy twice daily with 6h interfraction interval) and one patient received a dose of 75.6 Gy. The whole dose to the mandibular-orophryngeal region was delivered with 6 MV photons. The mandible was contoured manually on computed tomographic scans and the point doses at the both mandibular condyles, ascending ramus, mental symphysis, molar and retromolar regions were assessed. Moreover, the cumulative dose-volume histograms (DHVs) were evaluated. The median follow-up period for alive patients is 30 months (range, 21-44+ months).ResultsTumor remission was observed in 17 patients: in 11 cases, complete remission was achieved and in six cases, only partial remission was possible. One patient was lost to follow-up before the first response evaluation. The median survival for all patients is 22 months (range, 3-44+ months). Ten patients are alive and seven died. In six cases, the cause of death was head and neck tumor and in one died due to pancreatic cancer (second primary). No late bone post-radiation complication was seen. The highest radiotherapy doses were observed in the retromolar regions. The mean percentage doses at the right and left retromolar regions were 101.3+/-3.8% (range, 90.2-109.1%) and 101.7+/-2.5% (range, 95.2-105.8%), respectively. Lower doses were seen in ascending ramus (the mean percentage doses at right and left ascending ramus were 97.3+/-8.5% and 97.8+/-7.6%, respectively), the molar regions (the mean percentage doses at right and left molar regions were 86.0+/-13.5% and 88.1+/-12.9%, respectively), and at the mandibular condyles (the mean percentage doses at the right and left mandibular condyles were 72.6+/-18% and 77.0+/-16.5%, respectively). The volume of the mandible ranged from 60.1 to 110.1cm(3) (a mean of of 82.3 cm(3)). In all patients, the maximum dose absorbed in the mandible was higher than the dose prescribed in the ICRU point and the mean maximum dose absorbed in the mandible was 105.7+/-2.1% (range, 102.4-110.6%). The percentage of mandibular volume receiving a dose higher than prescribed was 28.6+/-14.9% (range 10.2-58.1%). The area underlying the DVH curve, the maximum mandibular doses and the retromolar doses did not appear to statistically depend on use of wedge or mandibular volume.ConclusionsRadiotherapy for oropharyngeal cancer is associated with high doses to the retromolar mandibular regions (the dose can be higher than prescribed in the ICRU reference point), ascending ramus and molar regions. Lower doses are absorbed at the condyles and mental symphysis. The single dose point (for example, the ICRU reference point) could be not used as a representative for the mandibular dose. In our small series of patients treated with hyperfractionated irradiation, these dose heterogeneities were not correlated to the patient- and treatment-related factors and are not related to the increased risk of late bone complications. The clinical relevance of mandibular dose distribution remains to be established in larger series of patients treated with conventionally and unconventionally fractionated irradiation.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…