• Spine J · Dec 2009

    Recurrence of kyphosis and its functional implications after surgical stabilization of dorsolumbar unstable burst fractures.

    • Palaniappan Lakshmanan, Alwyn Jones, Jwalant Mehta, Sashin Ahuja, Paul Rhys Davies, and John P Howes.
    • University Hospital of Wales, University Hospital Llandough, Cardiff, UK. lakunns@gmail.com
    • Spine J. 2009 Dec 1;9(12):1003-9.

    Background ContextTreatment of unstable burst fractures in the dorsolumbar spine still remains controversial. Surgical stabilization has been aimed to prevent long-term back pain and progression of deformity.PurposeThis study was aimed to analyze the degree of loss of correction of the angle of kyphosis with pedicle screw instrumentation in place and the components responsible for the recurrence of kyphosis after surgical stabilization of dorsolumbar A3 fractures and to assess the return of functional capacity in these patients.Study DesignRetrospective study.Patient SampleThis study involves 26 patients who had dorsolumbar unstable burst fractures (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen type A3).Outcome MeasuresRadiological assessment at injury, immediate postoperative period, and most recent follow-up along with functional assessment using short form 36 (SF-36) and return to work.MethodsAll the patients had posterior pedicle screw instrumentation without fusion for unstable dorsolumbar burst compression (A3) fractures. The mean follow-up period was 25.5 months. All of them had their fractures stabilized with Universal Spinal System (Synthes, Welwyn Garden City, UK) Fracture System. Serial standing lateral radiographs were taken from the immediate postoperative period to the most recent follow-up. The angle of kyphosis; the heights of the discs above and below the fractured vertebra; and the heights of the vertebral bodies above, at, and below the fractured level were measured. The height at each level was measured in three segments (anterior, middle, and posterior). The values were normalized to avoid discrepancies while comparing radiographs. The difference in the height of each segment measured between the immediate postoperative period and the most recent follow-up was computed.ResultsThe mean angle of kyphosis was 6.3+/-8.9 in the immediate postoperative period and 15.7+/-6.7 at the most recent follow-up (p<.001). The mean patient function score from SF-36 was 52.3%, and the mean pain score was 44.9%. There was no relationship to the loss of correction angle of kyphosis to the patient function score (r=0.06, p=.76) and the pain score (r=0.11, p=.58). The correlation between the corresponding difference in the height of each segment and the degree of loss of correction of the angle of kyphosis showed positive correlation to the decrease in the anterior and middle segment heights at the fractured vertebral level.ConclusionThere is a progressive loss of correction of the angle of kyphosis after posterior stabilization with instrumentation even without implant removal that mainly corresponds to the decrease in the anterior segment height of the fractured vertebral body.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.