-
Am. J. Gastroenterol. · May 2003
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialUtility of Web-based assessment of patient satisfaction with endoscopy.
- Gavin C Harewood, Maurits J Wiersema, and Piet C de Groen.
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota 55905, USA.
- Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2003 May 1;98(5):1016-21.
ObjectivesThe dramatic growth of the World Wide Web (Web) holds potential for use in survey distribution and submission. Its use has not previously been studied in the context of patient satisfaction with endoscopy procedures. In this study we compared standard mail, telephone, and Web-based modes of endoscopy satisfaction survey administration with respect to response rate and response content.MethodsAn endoscopy satisfaction questionnaire consisting of seven core items from the modified Group Health Association of America (GHAA-9) was distributed to patients after routine outpatient endoscopy. Patients were randomized to receive the questionnaire by standard mail, telephone, or Web (if applicable). Response rates and satisfaction scores in the groups were compared. The nonresponders to the standard mail and Web surveys were subsequently contacted by telephone to determine their level of satisfaction.ResultsResponse rates to the telephone survey (81% among those designated as non-Web users and 78% among Web users) and standard mail (75% non-Web users, 67% Web users) were higher than response rate to the Web-based survey (34%) (p < or = 0.0005). There was no significant difference in satisfaction scores among the groups or between satisfaction of nonresponders and responders.ConclusionsThe potential of our Web-based survey was limited by poor response rates. This arose from privacy protection precautions that complicated access to the Web site. Future Web-based strategies for surveying patients will need to be more user-friendly while maintaining the intent of the recent Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act regulations.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.