• Guo-dong Liu, Qing-gang Zhang, Shan Ou, Le-shun Zhou, Jun Fei, Hong-wei Chen, Guo-xin Nan, and Jian-wen Gu.
• Department 8, Research Institute of Surgery, Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400042, PR China. Electronic address: frankliugd@163.com.
• Int J Surg. 2013 Jan 1;11(9):864-8.

ObjectiveThe purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes of intramedullary nailing and plate fixation in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures using meta-analysis.MethodsPubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Controlled Clinical Trials Register (CCTR) databases were searched for studies that investigated the efficacy of intramedullary nailing and plate fixation in the management of humeral shaft fractures. Delayed healing rate, nonunion, postoperative infection and radial nerve paralysis were key outcomes of interest. Data were searched within the time period of July 1990 through September 2012. The statistical software RevMan 5.0 was used to analyze the statistical significance of the results.ResultsTotal 459 cases of patients in 10 literature, including 231 cases of plate group and 228 cases of the intramedullary nailing groups were collected. The results of meta-analysis showed that delayed healing rate of humeral shaft fractures was lower in plate fixation compared with intramedullary nailing (RR = 2.64, 95% CI (1.08, 6.49), P < 0.05). No statistically significant difference in nonunion, postoperative infections, radial nerve paralysis and other complications was identified between nailing and plate fixation groups (P > 0.05).ConclusionsIn general, the effect size of intramedullary nailing may be comparable to that of plate fixation in the terms of nonunion, postoperative infections, radial nerve paralysis. The only slightly difference was identified in the event of delayed healing rate.Copyright © 2013 Surgical Associates Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

17 keywords...

hide…