• J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatr. · Aug 2005

    Whiplash following rear end collisions: a prospective cohort study.

    • L H Pobereskin.
    • louis.pobereskin@phnt.swest.nhs.uk
    • J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatr. 2005 Aug 1;76(8):1146-51.

    ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to investigate the factors which predict neck pain initially and at 1 year following a rear end collision.MethodsAll people who reported a rear end collision to the Devon and Cornwall Constabulary were identified and formed the basis of the cohort. People were excluded if they were under 18 years of age or had suffered a head injury. The main outcome measures were neck pain lasting for more than a week after the accident and neck pain at least 1 day a week at 1 year. Logistic regression was used to investigate associations between demographic and accident related variables and outcomes.ResultsA total of 1147 people reported rear end collisions to the police during the study period and 503 (44%) agreed to take part in the study. Of the respondents, 78% had neck pain lasting for more than a week and 52% still had pain at 1 year. Age (odds ratio, 95% confidence interval: 0.957, 0.942-0.972) and prior history of neck pain (8.32, 2.89-23.89) were the most important predictors of early neck pain. The most important predictors of pain at 1 year were the initial neck visual analogue scale (VAS) score (1.03, 1.01-1.05) and the presence of a compensation claim (4.09, 1.62-10.32). There was only weak evidence that measures of the severity of the impact were associated with outcomes.ConclusionDemographic variables and the presence of a compensation suit show the strongest correlation with acute and chronic neck pain following rear end collisions.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.