• Minim Invas Neurosur · Aug 2008

    Treatment of degenerative cervical disc disease with uncoforaminotomy--intermediate clinical outcome.

    • I Pechlivanis, C Brenke, M Scholz, M Engelhardt, A Harders, and K Schmieder.
    • Department of Neurosurgery, Ruhr-University Bochum, Knappschaftskrankenhaus-Bochum-Langendreer, In der Schornau 23-25, Bochum, Germany. ioannis.pechlivanis@ruhr-uni-bochum.de
    • Minim Invas Neurosur. 2008 Aug 1;51(4):211-7.

    BackgroundAnterior cervical uncoforaminotomy (uncoforaminotomy) is an operative method intended to preserve the functional motion segment of the cervical spine while removing the underlying pathology. Controversy exists concerning the patients best suited for this treatment modality. Furthermore, no long-term outcome analyses have been published.MethodsBetween November 2002 and June 2004, 96 patients underwent single-level uncoforaminotomy in our neurosurgical department for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy. The patients were divided into three groups: A, soft disc; B, hard disc; C, hard and soft disc. Follow-up was performed 2 years after surgery. Clinical outcome was classified according to Odom et al. and to the cervical Oswestry and 11-point box scales for arm and neck pain.ResultsNinety patients (92%) underwent intermediate follow-up examinations at an average of 33 months after surgery. Forty-nine patients were in group A, 24 in group B, and 17 in group C. At discharge, 98% of those in group A, 96% in group B, and 94% in group C showed excellent or good results. In two patients revision surgery was performed within 4 weeks due to recurrent disc herniation. In one patient revision was carried out due to a subcutaneous hematoma. In group B one case of vertebral artery injury occurred. Additionally in one patient of this group revision surgery was performed due to inadequate decompression of the neural foramen. At follow-up 94% of the patients in group A, 89% in group B, and 87% in group C had excellent or good results. The scores on the cervical Oswestry scale and the 11-point-box scale showed no significant differences among the groups.ConclusionUncoforaminotomy, especially in patients with soft-disc pathologies, is a good operative method for the treatment of radicular pain.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…