• Ulrike Sagen, Tom Gunnar Vik, Torbjørn Moum, Tore Mørland, Arnstein Finset, and Toril Dammen.
• Department of Behavioral Sciences in Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, 0317 Oslo, Norway. ulrike.sagen@sthf.no
• J Psychosom Res. 2009 Oct 1;67(4):325-32.

ObjectiveAnxiety and depression after stroke are frequent, but are often overlooked and not assessed. The aims of the study were to (1) assess the prevalence of anxiety and depression and (2) compare the performance of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) as screening instruments for anxiety and depression disorders 4 months after stroke.MethodsStroke patients, consecutively admitted to a stroke unit, were assessed with HADS and MADRS 4 months after stroke (n=104). Depression and anxiety disorders were diagnosed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID). Measures were compared in terms of correlations, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, overall agreement, kappa, and ROC curves, using DSM-IV diagnoses of "at least one current significant anxiety disorder" (Anxiety) and "any current depression" (Depression), as the clinical criteria.ResultsAnxiety occurred in 23% of patients and Depression in 19% (13% major depression, 3% minor depression, 4% dysthymia). For Anxiety, the optimal screening cut-off was 4 for HADS-A and 6 for HADS-total; for Depression, optimal cut-offs were 4 for HADS-D, 11 for HADS-total, and 8 for MADRS. At cut-offs commonly used in clinical practice for depression screening (HADS-D: 8, MADRS: 12), the MADRS performed marginally better than the HADS.ConclusionAnxiety is as prevalent as depression 4 months after stroke. MADRS and HADS-D perform acceptably as screening instruments for depression, and HADS-A for anxiety after stroke. However, lower HADS cut-offs than recommended for the general population should be considered for stroke patients.

26 keywords...

hide…