• J. Vasc. Surg. · Aug 2006

    Comparative Study

    Forearm cephalic vein cross-sectional area changes at incremental congestion pressures: towards a standardized and reproducible vein mapping protocol.

    • R Nils Planken, Xavier H Keuter, Alfons G Kessels, Arnold P Hoeks, Tim Leiner, and Jan H Tordoir.
    • Department of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. N.Planken@surgery.azm.nl
    • J. Vasc. Surg. 2006 Aug 1;44(2):353-8.

    ObjectivesDuplex ultrasonography assessment of superficial forearm veins is frequently used before a hemodialysis arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is created. There is, however, no standardized preoperative duplex ultrasonography protocol. This study assessed B-mode image analysis reproducibility and reproducibility of repeated forearm superficial venous diameter measurements on different days at different venous congestion pressures (VCPs).MethodsDiameters were determined using B-mode ultrasonography in 10 healthy male volunteers on days 1 and 14 at incremental VCP values (10 to 80 mm Hg). Intra- and interobserver agreement was assessed for B-mode image analysis by calculating interclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Reproducibility of repeated diameter measurements (maximum and minimum diameter at days 1 and 14), cross-sectional area size increase, and shape change due to incremental VCPs were determined by calculating ICC values.ResultsAnalysis of intraobserver agreement of B-mode image interpretation yielded ICC values of 0.97 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94 to 0.99) and 0.97 (95% CI, 0.96 to 0.99) for determination of maximum and minimum diameters, respectively. Interobserver agreement analysis yielded ICC values of 0.95 (95% CI, 0.92 to 0.97) and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.96 to 0.99) for determination of maximum and minimum diameters, respectively. Reproducibility of repeated diameter measurements on days 1 and 14 improved substantially at incremental VCP values, with best reproducibility at VCPs >40 mm Hg. Repeated determination of cross-sectional area size increase and shape change due to VCP increase from 10 to 80 mm Hg yielded ICC values of 0.49 (95% CI, 0.19 to 1.00) and 0.09 (95% CI, 0.00 to 0.92), respectively. Maximum and minimum diameters as well as cross-sectional area size increased significantly (P < .01) due to VCP increase during both sessions. Cross-sectional area shape changed significantly (P < .01) due to VCP increase during both sessions.ConclusionsDiameter measurements on B-mode images are largely observer independent. Superficial venous cross-sectional area shape is noncircular, and cross-sectional area size depends on VCP. Both maximum and minimum venous diameters should be determined at VCPs >40 mm Hg to attain the best reproducibility. Further studies are needed to determine whether a standardized preoperative vein mapping protocol can reduce AVF nonmaturation rates.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…