• J Pain Symptom Manage · Sep 2011

    Assessing agreement between terminally ill cancer patients' reports of their quality of life and family caregiver and palliative care physician proxy ratings.

    • Jennifer M Jones, Christine J McPherson, Camilla Zimmermann, Gary Rodin, Lisa W Le, and S Robin Cohen.
    • Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. jennifer.jones@uhn.on.ca
    • J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 Sep 1;42(3):354-65.

    ContextProxy ratings, if valid, may provide an alternative approach to evaluating patient quality of life (QoL) at the end of life.ObjectivesTo examine agreement between terminally ill cancer patients' self-reported QoL and proxy assessment of patient QoL by their family caregiver (FCG) and palliative care physicians (PCPs) at two time points.MethodsPatients admitted to an acute palliative care unit and their FCGs and PCPs completed the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire (MQOL) at Days 3 and 6 after admission. Response bias and response precision were examined at the individual and group levels. Furthermore, we examined patient factors affecting agreement and responsiveness of proxy MQOL scores to changes in patients' QoL between Days 3 and 6.ResultsStatistically and clinically significant mean differences were detected between the patient and both proxy groups' reports of QoL on Day 3, with the magnitude of the differences decreasing somewhat by Day 6. Proxies underestimated patients' QoL compared with patients' self-report. Response precision based on intraclass correlation values and proportion of approximate agreement was poor to fair at both time points. Agreement was better for patients with greater physical burden and more cognitive difficulties. Proxies' responsiveness to change from Day 3 to Day 6 was low, and proxies were not able to detect minimally important changes in QoL.ConclusionThe findings suggest that moderate agreement between patient and proxy ratings of QoL develops over time but that precision at the individual level, which is more clinically relevant, is less reliable. New strategies for improving proxy reliability are needed.Copyright © 2011 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…