• Noa Segall, Alberto S Bonifacio, Rebecca A Schroeder, Atilio Barbeito, Dawn Rogers, Deirdre K Thornlow, James Emery, Sally Kellum, Melanie C Wright, Jonathan B Mark, and Durham VA Patient Safety Center of Inquiry.
• Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3094, Durham, NC 27710, USA. noa.segall@duke.edu
• Anesth. Analg. 2012 Jul 1; 115 (1): 102-15.

AbstractPostoperative patient handovers are fraught with technical and communication errors and may negatively impact patient safety. We systematically reviewed the literature on handover of care from the operating room to postanesthesia or intensive care units and summarized process and communication recommendations based on these findings. From >500 papers, we identified 31 dealing with postoperative handovers. Twenty-four included recommendations for structuring the handover process or information transfer. Several recommendations were broadly supported, including (1) standardize processes (e.g., through the use of checklists and protocols); (2) complete urgent clinical tasks before the information transfer; (3) allow only patient-specific discussions during verbal handovers; (4) require that all relevant team members be present; and (5) provide training in team skills and communication. Only 4 of the studies developed an intervention and formally assessed its impact on different process measures. All 4 interventions improved metrics of effectiveness, efficiency, and perceived teamwork. Most of the papers were cross-sectional studies that identified barriers to safe, effective postoperative handovers including the incomplete transfer of information and other communication issues, inconsistent or incomplete teams, absent or inefficient execution of clinical tasks, and poor standardization. An association between poor-quality handovers and adverse events was also demonstrated. More innovative research is needed to define optimal patient handovers and to determine the effect of handover quality on patient outcomes.

26 keywords...

hide…