• J Spinal Disord Tech · Oct 2006

    Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study

    Measurement of lumbar lordosis: inter-rater reliability, minimum detectable change and longitudinal variation.

    • Gregory E Hicks, Steven Z George, Michael A Nevitt, Jane A Cauley, and Molly T Vogt.
    • Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA. ghicks@som.umaryland.edu
    • J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006 Oct 1;19(7):501-6.

    Study DesignRepeated measures design to examine reliability and longitudinal variation of lumbar lordosis measurement.ObjectivesTo determine the interrater reliability, minimum detectable change (MDC) and longitudinal variation of the Cobb method for measuring lumbar lordosis using standardized rules.Summary Of Background DataThe reliability of the 4-line Cobb method for measuring lumbar lordosis was not examined when standardized rules were instituted for drawing the lines.MethodsA random sample of participants was selected from the Pittsburgh clinic of the multicenter Study of Osteoporotic Fractures for radiographic measurement of lumbar lordosis reliability (n=48) and stability (n=109). A standardized version of the 4-line Cobb method was used for all measurements of lordosis. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was used to calculate interrater reliability for lordosis and to measure the stability of this measure over an approximate 2-year-time period. The standard error of measurement and MDC were calculated for lordosis measurement based on the ICC value.ResultsThe interrater reliability coefficient for lumbar lordosis was in the excellent range (ICC=0.98; 95% CI: 0.95, 0.99). The MDC based on measurements between raters was 3.90 degrees. The ICC value for the stability, or reliability from time 1 to time 2, of lordosis measurement over time was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.74, 0.87).ConclusionThis study demonstrates that the 4-line Cobb method can be a highly reliable and precise method for measuring lumbar lordosis if standardized procedures are used. The Cobb method has an MDC that is appropriate for clinical use. Also, there is minimal longitudinal variation in lordosis measurements over a 2-year period.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…