• Tim M Cook, Bruce McCormick, Kim Gupta, Paul Hersch, and Tom Simpson.
• Royal United Hospital, NHS Trust, Combe Park, BA1 3NG Bath, UK. timcook@ukgateway.net
• Resuscitation. 2003 Aug 1; 58 (2): 139-43.

AbstractThe PA(xpress) phayngeal airway (PA(x)) is a new single use airway device that might be used for airway maintenance during anaesthesia or cardiopulmonary resuscitation. We evaluated the performance of the PA(x) in 103 anaesthetised non-paralysed patients undergoing non-emergency anaesthesia. We recorded success of insertion, quality of airway achieved and complications of its use. We were successful in establishing a clear airway on the first attempt on 68 (67%) occasions. We were unable to establish a patent airway in nine (9%) patients. Partial or intermittent airway obstruction occurred during maintenance of anaesthesia in ten (11%) cases but none required removal of the device. Jaw thrust was used to assist insertion in all cases. A mean of 1.37 further manipulations per patient were required to establish an airway and 0.60 per patient were required during maintenance of anaesthesia. In the 94 patients in whom an airway was established, assisted ventilation was excellent in 77 (82%). Leak pressure was 20 cmH2O or above in 58% cases. Intracuff pressure was measured in 55 patients: mean pressure was 68 cmH2O and was above 100 cmH2O in ten (18%) cases. Complications occurred in 38 (37%) patients during insertion, in a further 12 (13%) during maintenance and in eight (9%) during emergence. The device was difficult to insert and associated with a high incidence of trauma: blood was visible on the device after removal in 56 (55%) cases. We conclude that the PA(x) is associated with too high a failure rate and too high an incidence of minor complications for routine airway maintenance.

16 keywords...

hide…