• The Laryngoscope · Jun 2014

    Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical Trial

    Continuous vagal IONM prevents recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis by revealing initial EMG changes of impending neuropraxic injury: a prospective, multicenter study.

    • Eimear Phelan, Rick Schneider, Kerstin Lorenz, Henning Dralle, Dipti Kamani, Andre Potenza, Niranjan Sritharan, Jenifer Shin, and Gregory W Randolph.
    • Division of Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery, Department of Laryngology and Otology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
    • Laryngoscope. 2014 Jun 1;124(6):1498-505.

    Objectives/HypothesisExisting intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) formats stimulate the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) intermittently, exposing it to risk for injury in between stimulations. We report electrophysiologic parameters of continuous vagal monitoring, utilizing a novel real-time IONM format, and relate these parameters to intraoperative surgical maneuvers that delineate nascent adverse but reversible electrophysiologic parameters to prevent nerve injury. These results are correlated with postoperative vocal cord functional outcome.Study DesignProspective multicenter tertiary study.MethodEvoked vagal nerve waveform amplitude and latency changes during 102 thyroidectomies were recorded. Adverse electrophysiologic response was categorized into 1-concordant amplitude reduction and latency increase events (combined events) and 2-loss of signal (LOS). Surgical maneuvers were modified when adverse electrophysiologic findings were noted. All patients underwent preoperative and postoperative laryngoscopy; intraoperative electrophysiologic findings were correlated with postoperative laryngeal function.ResultsContinuous vagal monitoring did not result in stimulation-evoked nerve injury or intraoperative adverse cardiac, pulmonary, or gastrointestinal effects. Both intraoperative combined events and LOS were associated with development of vocal cord paralysis (VCP) (P = 0.001 and P >0.001 respectively). Combined events had a positive predictive value (PPV) of 33%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 97%, and were reversible in 73%. LOS had a PPV of 83%, NPV of 98%, and was reversible in only 17%. Milder combined events and isolated amplitude or latency changes were not associated with VCP.ConclusionsContinuous vagal monitoring is safe and provides real-time RLN evaluation during surgical maneuvers. Combined events and LOS, both easily identifiable intraoperatively, are related to the development of VCP. A combined event represents a largely reversible electrophysiologic change when the associated surgical maneuver is aborted. If allowed to continue, it can advance to LOS (which typically is significantly less reversible) and to postoperative VCP. Continuous vagal monitoring has utility in identifying real-time adverse concordant amplitude and latency changes (combined events), which can prompt modification of the associated surgical maneuver and may prevent RLN paralysis during thyroidectomy.Level Of Evidence4.© 2014 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…