• Pharmacotherapy · Dec 2004

    Retrospective evaluation of commonly used equations to predict energy expenditure in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients.

    • Earnest Alexander, Gregory M Susla, Aaron H Burstein, Dennis T Brown, and Frederick P Ognibene.
    • Department of Pharmacy Services, Tampa General Hospital, Tampa, Florida 33601-1289, USA. ealexander@tgh.org
    • Pharmacotherapy. 2004 Dec 1;24(12):1659-67.

    Study ObjectiveTo determine which of four commonly used equations to estimate energy expenditure is precise and unbiased compared with energy expenditure as measured by indirect calorimetry.DesignRetrospective, observational study.SettingAdult medical intensive care unit in a research hospital of the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center.PatientsSeventy-six adult, mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients.InterventionIndirect calorimetry reports generated by the National Institutes of Health Critical Care Medicine Department's Metabolic Cart Consult Service were reviewed. Bias and precision of resting energy expenditure (REE) estimated by equations were computed using mean prediction error (ME) and root mean squared prediction error (MSE). Equations were considered precise if the 95% confidence interval for MSE was within 15% of the measured energy expenditure (MEE) determined by indirect calorimetry. Equations were considered unbiased if the 95% confidence interval for ME included zero. Paired t tests were used to compare estimated REE values for each predictive equation with MEE values determined by indirect calorimetry. Data were stratified into regions of bias using classification and regression tree analysis, as well as visual inspection of estimated REE-versus-MEE curves for each equation.Measurements And Main ResultsThe Harris-Benedict equation multiplied by an activity factor of 1.2 was unbiased and precise. The Ireton-Jones equation was precise but biased. The American College of Chest Physicians' consensus recommendation was biased and imprecise. The Harris-Benedict equation without an activity factor also demonstrated bias and imprecision.ConclusionsThe Harris-Benedict equation multiplied by an activity factor of 1.2 is suitable for predicting REE and may be used in the absence of indirect calorimetry.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.