• B Kuvaki Balkan, L Iyilikçi, F Günenç, H Uzümlü, H C Kara, L Celik, I Durak, and E Gökel.
• Department of Anaesthesiology, Dokuz Eylül University Medical School, Izmir - Turkey. bkuvaki@deu.edu.tr
• Eur J Ophthalmol. 2004 Nov 1;14(6):473-7.

PurposeTopical anesthesia is increasingly being used for cataract surgery. However, it is believed that topical anesthesia causes an increased risk of intraoperative complications from unrestricted eye movement and insufficient pain control and more need for sedation. It is difficult to compare pain and anxiety experienced by individual patients; therefore, the authors used the method of patient-controlled sedation to determine whether there is a difference in sedation requirements under topical or retrobulbar anesthesia.MethodsIn this prospective study, patients received either topical anesthesia (n=87) or retrobulbar block (n=104) and self-administered a mixture of midazolam (0.5 mg) and fentanyl (25 microg) in increments using a patient controlled analgesia infuser to achieve sedation. At the end of surgery, patients rated their pain on a 10-point numerical rating scale and their comfort on a 5-point scale. The number of demands and deliveries were noted from the patient controlled analgesia infuser display.ResultsPain scores were between 0 and 2 in 95.4% in the topical and in 94.2% in the retrobulbar group (p>0.05). Patient comfort was equal in both groups with 2.94+/-0.92 in the topical group and 2.92+/-0.99 in the retrobulbar group (p>0.05). Mean sedation requirements were similar in both groups: 26.4% of patients in the topical group and 19.2% in the retrobulbar group did not request any sedation (not significant, p>0.05).ConclusionsSedation requirements were similar for cataract surgery under topical and retrobulbar anesthesia.

35 keywords...

hide…