• J Spinal Disord · Aug 1999

    Findings and outcome of revision lumbar disc surgery.

    • S Ozgen, S Naderi, M M Ozek, and M N Pamir.
    • Department of Neurosurgery, Marmara University, School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
    • J Spinal Disord. 1999 Aug 1;12(4):287-92.

    AbstractOne hundred fourteen patients (64 men, 50 women) with prior lumbar disc surgery underwent a reexploration for intractable back and/or leg pain. The finding in revision surgery included disc herniation in 89 cases (78%), epidural fibrosis in 14 cases (12.2%), adhesive arachnoiditis in 4 cases (3.5%), isolated lateral spinal stenosis in 3 cases (2.6%), and iatrogenic instability in 4 cases (3.5%). Review of operative reports of patients who underwent a first operation in our institute revealed that seven cases (12.5%) had a second laminotomy without a discectomy in addition to the previous laminotomy and discectomy performed in the same session. Fifty-six of the patients with disc hemiation in revision surgery had a true recurrence. Disc hemiation was protruded in 38 cases (42.8%), extruded in 44 cases (49.4%), and sequestrated in 7 cases (7.8%). The outcome was assessed using Prolo's functional and economic scale. According to Prolo's scale, a good outcome was detected in 79 cases (69.2%), moderate in 22 (19.2%), and a poor outcome was detected in 13 cases (11.4%). The best outcome was achieved in patients with disc hemiation. It is concluded that recurrent disc disease is the most important cause of reexploration. This fact dictates a careful preoperative workup and discectomy in the first intervention. The likelihood of occurrence of disc herniation in the negative laminotomy level (i.e., laminotomy without discectomy procedure) also requires a careful preoperative radiologic workup before lumbar disc surgery.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…