-
Southern medical journal · Oct 1995
Comparative StudyProspective survey of continuous versus single-injection spinal anesthesia in obstetrics.
- D Bayhi, R C Cork, J F Heaton, and T E Nolan.
- Department of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Medical Center, New Orleans 70112-2822, USA.
- South. Med. J. 1995 Oct 1;88(10):1043-8.
AbstractPrior to the removal of spinal microcatheters from the market in 1992, these catheters were used extensively in the Obstetric Anesthesia Service at the Medical Center of Louisiana. We report on a prospective survey of the clinical application of single-injection versus continuous-catheter spinal anesthesia. Two hundred sixteen patients had single-injection anesthesia, and 218 had continuous-catheter anesthesia. No neurologic complications other than postdural puncture headache (PDPH) were encountered in either group. Five patients had PDPH after single-injection technique, and 8 patients had PDPH from continuous spinal anesthesia. Patients with diabetes were at higher risk for PDPH, and blacks were at lower risk (relative risks 4.35 and 0.31, respectively). Additionally, PDPH was associated with lower intraoperative urine output. No increased risk of complications was found after continuous spinal anesthesia with microcatheters.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*,_underline_or**bold**. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>and subscript<sub>text</sub>. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3., hyphens-or asterisks*. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com) - Images can be included with:
 - For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote..