• F Frantzeskaki, A Amygdalou, T R Rasmussen, M P Vassiliou, and P K Behrakis.
• Department of Experimental Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Athens, Goudi, Athens, Greece. Frantzeskaki@hotmail.com
• Respir Med. 2003 Feb 1;97(2):159-66.

AbstractThe purpose of the present study was to assess the mechanical behavior of the respiratory system separately during inspiration and expiration in adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and the influence of PEEP on any phasic variations ofthe mechanical respiratory parameters. Airways pressure (P), flow (V), and volume (V) signals were recorded in nine patients with ARDS and 10 patients without known respiratory disorder (control group). All patients were artificially ventilated at three levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP): 0, 5, and 10 hPa. Data were analyzed separately for inspiratory and expiratory records using multiple linear regression analysis (MLRA) according to the equation: P=Ers V+Rrs V'+P0, where Ers and Rrs represent, respectively, the intubated respiratory system elastance and resistance, and P0 the end-expiratory pressure. In the ARDS group expiratory Ers (ErsEXP=45.58 +/- 4.24 hPa/L) was substantially higher (p<0.01) than inspiratory Ers (ErsINSP=36.76 +/- 2.55) with a marked effect of applied PEEP in diminishing the difference between ErsEXP and ErsINSP (p<0.01). For the ARDS group inspiratory Rrs (RrsINSP) decreased significantly with increasing PEEP (PEEP=0: RrsINSP=16.43, PEEP=10: RrsINSP=13.28, p<0.01). The found differences between ErsEXP and ErsINSP could be attributable to an influence of mechanical ventilation by positive airway pressure on pulmonary edemaand interstitial fluid during the inspiratory phase of the respiratory cycle.

15 keywords...

hide…