-
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. · Jan 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialOperations on the thoracic aorta and hypothermic circulatory arrest: is aprotinin safe?
- M Ehrlich, M Grabenwöger, F Cartes-Zumelzu, D Luckner, J Kovarik, G Laufer, A Kocher, R Konetschny, E Wolner, and M Havel.
- Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, University of Vienna, Austria.
- J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1998 Jan 1;115(1):220-5.
IntroductionThe safety of aprotinin, especially when used with profound hypothermic circulatory arrest, is still a matter of intense debate despite its presumed salutary effects on blood loss. Many investigators have reported toxic renal effects of high-dose aprotinin in such patients, but no prospective, randomized study has been conducted. To assess the potential detrimental effect of aprotinin on renal function and its putative reduction of blood loss, 50 patients undergoing thoracic aortic operations with the use of profound hypothermic circulatory arrest were randomly assigned to receive either low-dose aprotinin (1 x 10(6) kallikrein activation units) or placebo.MethodsThe specific renal tubular markers beta-2-microglobulin and beta-N-acetyl-D-glucosaminidase, as well as serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen, creatinine clearance, sodium excretion, and potassium excretion, were measured to evaluate renal function preoperatively, immediately after the procedure, and 24 hours and 48 hours later.ResultsNo statistically significant difference was found in any measured renal parameter between the two groups (analysis of variance). Renal dysfunction, defined as an elevation of serum creatinine early postoperatively (> or = 1.5 times the preoperative value), occurred in two patients who received aprotinin and in one patient in the control group. Temporary dialysis (hemodialysis or continuous venovenous hemofiltration) was needed in two patients in the aprotinin group versus one in the control group. Furthermore, patients treated with aprotinin had significantly less total postoperative blood loss (718 +/- 340 ml vs 920 +/- 387 ml, p = 0.04). The aprotinin recipients also had a significantly lower transfusion requirement (p < 0.05).ConclusionThis controlled trial of low-dose aprotinin in patients undergoing thoracic aortic operations using profound hypothermic circulatory arrest demonstrated no detectable deleterious effects on renal function; moreover, the use of aprotinin was associated with significantly lower need for transfusion.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.