• P D Robison, P K Harman, J K Trinkle, and F L Grover.
• University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio 78284-7841.
• J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 1988 Feb 1;95(2):184-90.

AbstractRecent reports of military thoracic injuries have advocated early thoracotomy and aggressive management of pulmonary injuries with resection as opposed to the more conservative and traditional treatment with chest tube thoracostomy. A retrospective study was therefore performed to determine the incidence of thoracotomy and lung resection in civilian injuries and to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment of these injuries. Between 1973 and 1985, in a series of 1,168 patients, there were 384 gunshot wounds and 784 stab wounds to the thorax. Two hundred eighty-three patients with a gunshot wound (74%) and 602 with a stab wound (77%) were treated with chest tubes alone. Sixty-eight patients (6% of the total) required operative repair of pulmonary hilar or parenchymal injury. Pulmonary resection was necessary in only 18 patients (nine with a gunshot wound and nine with a stab wound), and 10 patients had repair of hilar injuries (nine with a gunshot wound and one with a stab wound). Of patients requiring pulmonary resection, nine required wedge or segmental resection, six required lobectomy, and three patients required pneumonectomy. Mortality for all thoracic injuries was 2.3%: for those treated with chest tube alone, 0.7%; for pulmonary hilar injuries, 30%; for pulmonary parenchymal injuries, 8.6%; and for injuries necessitating lung resection, 28%. Most civilian lung injuries can be treated by tube thoracostomy alone. Although relatively few patients with primary pulmonary injury require thoracotomy, those that do are at significant risk and may require lung resection to control bleeding or hemoptysis or to remove destroyed or devitalized lung tissue.

24 keywords...

hide…