-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
[The efficacy of the moisture and warmed CO(2) for laparoscopic surgery].
- B A Agaev, G F Muslimov, T R Ibragimov, and G R Alieva.
- Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2013 Jan 1(11):35-9.
AbstractA prospective, randomized study comparing 150 patients undergoing laparoscopic operations (110 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholesystectomy and 40 patients laparoscopic fundoplication) with standard CO2 insufflation vs those receiving warmed, humidified CO2 was performed. All patients were randomized into 2 groups - 84 receiving standard CO2 insufflation (control group) and 66 receiving warmed, humidified CO2 (main group). Main variables included patient core temperature, postoperative pain, analgesic requirements and other postoperative dates. We revaeled that warmed, humidified CO2 has advantages that were statistically significant. Patients undergoing warmed, humidified carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation for maintain a warmer intraoperative core temperature, and have less postoperative pain and need less analgesic requirements than patients with standard CO2 insufflation.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*,_underline_or**bold**. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>and subscript<sub>text</sub>. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3., hyphens-or asterisks*. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com) - Images can be included with:
 - For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote..