• D A Partrick, E E Moore, D D Bensard, and F M Karrer.
• Department of Surgery, Denver Health Medical Center, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, 80204, USA.
• J Trauma. 2000 May 1;48(5):894-901.

BackgroundThe geographic distribution of trauma centers results in a significant number of children being treated in adult centers. The emphasis on nonoperative management of pediatric blunt trauma has heightened concern that in adult trauma centers, an aggressive operative approach will continue to be used. We hypothesized that pediatric commitment at a Level I trauma center results in appropriate nonoperative care of injured children as established by regional pediatric trauma centers.MethodsThe records of 1,792 consecutively treated children admitted to the trauma service during a 6-year period (January of 1990 to December of 1995) were reviewed. Patients were stratified into one of three age groups: 0 to 5, 6 to 11, and 12 to 17 years of age.ResultsMean age of the study patients was 10.0 +/- 0.1 years, 1,147 were boys (64%), and their mean Injury Severity Score was 7.3 +/- 0.3. The injury mechanism was blunt in 1,550 (87%) and 132 (7%) required laparotomy. In the 0- to 5-year-old blunt mechanism group, 6% underwent laparotomy or thoracotomy from 1990 to 1992. In comparison, only 1% of this age group had a laparotomy from 1993 to 1995 (p < 0.05, Fisher's exact test). A similar trend was found in the 6- to 11-year-old children after blunt injury (4% laparotomy rate from 1990 to 1992; 2% from 1993-1995).ConclusionThere has been a declining trend in the operative management of blunt pediatric trauma, especially in children less than 6 years old, whereas the operative management of penetrating injuries has remained stable. These data confirm that pediatric commitment in a Level I trauma center results in nonoperative treatment of injured children commensurate with that established in regional pediatric trauma centers.

30 keywords...

hide…