• Young-Kwon Ko, Yoon-Hee Kim, Sang-Il Park, Woo Suk Chung, Chan Noh, and Jung-Un Lee.
• Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.
• Korean J Anesthesiol. 2015 Apr 1;68(2):136-40.

BackgroundThis study compared intubating conditions and the onset time associated with administration of cisatracurium, a nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocker with a relatively slow onset, according to prior injection of one of two intravenous anesthetic agents: propofol or etomidate.MethodsForty-six female patients, undergoing general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation for elective surgery, were randomized to two groups; group P were administered propofol (2 mg/kg) prior to cisatracurium (0.2 mg/kg); group E were administered etomidate (0.3 mg/kg) prior to cisatracurium (0.2 mg/kg). We measured intubating conditions and the onset time according to the types of intravenous anesthetic administered. Measurements of heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were taken immediately prior to induction; immediately and 1 min after IV anesthetic administration; and immediately and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, and 15 min after endotracheal intubation.ResultsIntubating conditions were superior in group E compared with group P (P = 0.009). The average onset time of cisatracurium was more rapid in group E (155.74 ± 32.92 s vs. 185.26 ± 38.57 s in group P; P = 0.008). There were no group differences in SBP, DBP, and HR following intravenous anesthetic drug injection and endotracheal intubation. However, SBP and DBP were substantially higher in group E after endotracheal intubation.ConclusionsEtomidate improves intubating conditions and provide a more rapid onset time of cisatracurium during anesthetic induction compared to propofol.

5 keywords...

hide…