• Pain · Mar 1985

    Prediction of treatment response in pain patients: the illness self-concept repertory grid and EMG feedback.

    • R G Large.
    • Pain. 1985 Mar 1;21(3):279-87.

    AbstractEighteen patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain completed a trial of EMG feedback where each subject was exposed to biofeedback, a control condition and a waiting list. Pain scores were determined pre- and posttrial, and the percentage change calculated for each subject. EMG activity and present pain measured during the trial gave an EMG/pain correlation for each patient. A repertory grid was completed by each patient at the pretrial evaluation. Repertory grid technique is a highly flexible way of measuring subjective data such as attitudes. The specific test used involved the patient in rating a series of 6 self-concepts across 8 'constructs' or concepts concerning illness and emotional distress. The resulting matrix of 48 ratings was analysed to produce a measurement of 'distance' between the self and ideal-self concepts. The major finding was that the self-ideal-self distance was significantly positively correlated with pain score changes by rank correlation. The self-ideal-self distance is essentially a measure of self-satisfaction or dissatisfaction and the results imply that patients who show a relatively greater degree of self-dissatisfaction are more likely to respond well to EMG feedback. In addition, patients with high EMG/pain correlations had a better outcome and this measure also correlated with pain scores. The relationship between self-concepts and EMG/pain correlations is discussed. The Illness Self-Concept Repertory Grid appears capable of predicting treatment outcome and shows promise as a prognostic tool.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…