Comparing PECARN, CATCH, and CHALICE Rules for Children With Minor Head Injury along with two modalities of physician judgement showed significant variation in the sensitivities and specificities of the five modalities. Only physician practice and PECARN identified all traumatic brain injuries at a cost of lower specificity compared with CHALICE.

summary

• Joshua S Easter, Katherine Bakes, Jasmeet Dhaliwal, Michael Miller, Emily Caruso, and Jason S Haukoos.
• Denver Emergency Center for Children, Department of Emergency Medicine, Denver Health, Denver, CO; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Department of Emergency Medicine, Bon Secours St. Mary's Hospital, Richmond, VA; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA. Electronic address: joshua_easter@bshsi.org.
• Ann Emerg Med. 2014 Aug 1; 64 (2): 145152.e1525145-52, 152.e1-5.

Study ObjectiveWe evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of clinical decision rules and physician judgment for identifying clinically important traumatic brain injuries in children with minor head injuries presenting to the emergency department.MethodsWe prospectively enrolled children younger than 18 years and with minor head injury (Glasgow Coma Scale score 13 to 15), presenting within 24 hours of their injuries. We assessed the ability of 3 clinical decision rules (Canadian Assessment of Tomography for Childhood Head Injury [CATCH], Children's Head Injury Algorithm for the Prediction of Important Clinical Events [CHALICE], and Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network [PECARN]) and 2 measures of physician judgment (estimated of <1% risk of traumatic brain injury and actual computed tomography ordering practice) to predict clinically important traumatic brain injury, as defined by death from traumatic brain injury, need for neurosurgery, intubation greater than 24 hours for traumatic brain injury, or hospital admission greater than 2 nights for traumatic brain injury.ResultsAmong the 1,009 children, 21 (2%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1% to 3%) had clinically important traumatic brain injuries. Only physician practice and PECARN identified all clinically important traumatic brain injuries, with ranked sensitivities as follows: physician practice and PECARN each 100% (95% CI 84% to 100%), physician estimates 95% (95% CI 76% to 100%), CATCH 91% (95% CI 70% to 99%), and CHALICE 84% (95% CI 60% to 97%). Ranked specificities were as follows: CHALICE 85% (95% CI 82% to 87%), physician estimates 68% (95% CI 65% to 71%), PECARN 62% (95% CI 59% to 66%), physician practice 50% (95% CI 47% to 53%), and CATCH 44% (95% CI 41% to 47%).ConclusionOf the 5 modalities studied, only physician practice and PECARN identified all clinically important traumatic brain injuries, with PECARN being slightly more specific. CHALICE was incompletely sensitive but the most specific of all rules. CATCH was incompletely sensitive and had the poorest specificity of all modalities.Copyright © 2014 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

This article appears in the collection: General Stuff.

19 keywords...

hide…