• Sheng-Nan Chang, Juey-Jen Hwang, Yih-Sharng Chen, Jou-Wei Lin, and Fu-Tien Chiang.
• Cardiovascular Center, National Taiwan University Hospital Yun-Lin Branch, Dou-Liou City, Yun-Lin, Taiwan.
• Resuscitation. 2008 Jun 1;77(3):316-24.

ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to identify prognostic predictors for the patients experiencing cardiogenic shock who required the institution of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP).Design, Setting, And PatientsPatients with cardiogenic shock were retrieved from the clinical information system in National Taiwan University Hospital and classified according to their etiology: acute coronary syndrome (ACS), ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), congestive heart failure (CHF), hemodynamic instability after post-coronary bypass graft operation (post-CABG) or after percutaneous intervention (post-PCI), and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) victims.MeasurementsKaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression model were applied to evaluate the factors associated with survival.Main ResultsA total of 459 patients were found to belong to one of six etiology categories between 1995 and 2004. The 30-day mortality was highest in the OHCA group, followed by the STEMI, CHF, ACS, post-PCI, and post-CABG groups in a decreasing frequency (log rank p<0.001). Peak troponin I level was negatively associated with survival, and its effect largely paralleled with underlying etiology. Age and renal impairment were significant prognostic predictors for 30-day mortality (hazard ratio=1.031, p<0.001 and hazard ratio=1.266, p<0.001). Comparing to those manifested as OHCA who had the worst outcome, patients in the other etiology groups had significantly better survival.ConclusionsThis study has illustrated that age, renal function, and etiology-related cardiac injury are predictors for in-hospital course and mortality in those who experienced cardiogenic shock with IABP. The optimal strategy for revascularization in this high-risk group needs further validation.

14 keywords...

hide…