• J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatr. · Feb 1993

    Conventional and quantitative EEG in the diagnosis of delirium among the elderly.

    • S A Jacobson, A F Leuchter, and D O Walter.
    • Clinical Electrophysiology Laboratory, UCLA Neuropsychiatric Institute and Hospital.
    • J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatr. 1993 Feb 1;56(2):153-8.

    AbstractThis study was performed to determine whether an admission quantitative EEG (QEEG) could assist in the differential diagnosis of encephalopathy among a group of elderly subjects with delirium, dementia, and delirium coexistent with dementia. Thirty four subjects from 57 to 93 years had standard 17-channel EEG and quantitative EEG studies, using a linked-ear reference. EEGs were independently rated by two electroencephalographers blind to clinical diagnosis, using conventional criteria to assess the degree of encephalopathy. Brain maps were scored by a scale developed by the authors. Numerical data examined included mean posterior dominant frequency, absolute and relative power in the delta, theta and alpha bands, and slow-wave ratios. The grouping of experimental subjects was by the discharge diagnosis, made using DSM-III-R criteria. Stepwise discriminant analysis was performed to determine which EEG and QEEG variables were best able to distinguish cases. Variables which collectively distinguished normal from encephalopathic records were Mini-Mental State Examination scores and relative power in the alpha frequency band. Variables which collectively distinguished delirium from dementia were EEG theta activity, relative power in delta, and brain map rating. The results suggest that cross-sectional QEEG study is potentially useful in the early differential diagnosis of encephalopathy, and that the variables which distinguish normal from encephalopathic patients might differ from the variables which distinguish delirium from dementia.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.