• Spine · May 2003

    National and regional rates and variation of cervical discectomy with and without anterior fusion, 1990-1999.

    • Peter D Angevine, Ray R Arons, and Paul C McCormick.
    • Department of Neurological Surgery, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
    • Spine. 2003 May 1;28(9):931-9; discussion 940.

    Study DesignA national hospitalization database was used to determine rates and trends in the treatment of cervical disc disease.ObjectiveTo examine the temporal and geographic variations in hospitalizations and surgical procedures for cervical disc disease.Summary Of Background DataStudies of spinal surgery during the 1980s showed significant increases in the rates for all procedures, particularly those involving fusion. The management of cervical disc disease continues to be controversial.MethodsData from the National Hospital Discharge Survey from 1990 through 1999 were analyzed. Records were selected and categorized according to an algorithm of International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9) procedure and diagnosis codes.ResultsDuring the study period, the rate of hospitalization for surgical and nonsurgical treatment of cervical disc disease did not increase significantly. There was, however, a statistically significant increase in the proportion of hospitalizations for the surgical treatment of cervical disc disease that included a fusion procedure. There also was significant geographic variation in the rate of fusion procedures, with the South having the highest rate.ConclusionsAlthough the rate of surgery for cervical disc disease did not increase significantly during the 1990s, the rate of fusion procedures did rise significantly.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.