• S D Niles, R G Sutton, J Ploessl, and B Pennell.
• Perfusion Technology Program, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City 52242, USA.
• J Extra Corpor Technol. 1995 Dec 1;27(4):197-200.

AbstractAutomated activated clotting time (ACT) is utilized as the primary means of assessing anticoagulation status for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) procedures. Influences on the clotting cascade during CPB such as hypothermia, hemodilution, and platelet dysfunction are known to affect ACT. The recently introduced Thrombolytic Assessment System (TAS) has been reported to be less sensitive to changes in hemodilution and hypothermia during CPB than more conventional ACT devices. This study evaluated the ability of TAS, and two other commercially available automated ACT systems, the HemoTec and Hemochron, to correlate with circulating heparin levels. Reference standards for circulating heparin were determined by inactivation of factor Xa assay. Nineteen patients undergoing moderate hypothermic CPB served as subjects for this investigation. Blood samples were obtained for study at four time periods: 1) baseline (control), 2) post heparin administration (300-400 U/kg) prior to CPB, 3) during CPB, and 4) post protamine. Study results demonstrated a high correlation between the HemoTec and Hemochron (r = 0.99), increased heparin dose response on CPB compared to pre-CPB activity (p < 0.05), and a significant (p < 0.05) negative correlation between devices and patient hematocrit during CPB. Additionally, device correlation with anti-Xa assay during collection periods 2 and 3 showed negative correlations in each of the three devices evaluated. We conclude that all automated devices tested demonstrated an inability to predict circulating heparin at levels necessary for CPB, and that these discrepancies become magnified during CPB procedures.

26 keywords...

hide…