• Chirurg · Aug 2014

    Review

    [Is a different view on the pathophysiology of sepsis the key for novel therapeutic options?].

    • N Schlegel, S Flemming, M Meir, and C-T Germer.
    • Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Gefäß- und Kinderchirurgie, AG Inflammation und Sepsis, Universitätsklinik Würzburg, Oberdürrbacherstr. 6, 97080, Würzburg, Deutschland, Schlegel_N@ukw.de.
    • Chirurg. 2014 Aug 1;85(8):714-9.

    AbstractSepsis remains a critical problem in virtually all fields of clinical medicine. Despite intensive scientific and clinical efforts no significant progress has emerged in the fight against sepsis mortality. Solely the algorithm of the "surviving sepsis campaign" has proven to result in significantly enhanced survival of sepsis patients when consequently adopted. Novel research in the field of the complex immunological alterations in sepsis suggests that ongoing immunosuppression is the critical determinant underlying sepsis mortality. Therefore, it was proposed that immunostimulation might be a successful approach to improve outcome in individually selected patients. Others favor a different view on the pathophysiology of sepsis and support the notion that the manifestation of organ failure may be the dominant therapeutic target. Due to the fact that breakdown of the microcirculation and disruption of the microvascular barrier are critical events preceding organ failure, experimental therapeutic efforts to address these events led to promising results. Taken together, in view of the many initially promising experimental data and the failure to translate them into successful clinical therapies, a different view on the pathophysiology of sepsis is warranted to obtain the key for novel therapeutic options.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.