• D V Raichur, A P Aralihond, A V Kasturi, and D H Patil.
• Department of Pediatrics, Karnatak Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubli-580022, India. dr.devaraj@usa.net
• Indian J Pediatr. 2001 Jul 1;68(7):613-5.

AbstractCapillary refill time (CRT) is yet to be established as a specific clinical sign of peripheral circulation in neonates. This study was conducted to assess the influence of four body sites used for measurement, interobserver variability, sex, birth weight, age at assessment and room temperature on CRT recorded in healthy term neonates, at bedside. Two observers measured CRT in four different body sites (forehead, chest, palm and heel) of each of 155 healthy term neonates. Significant differences occurred between the mean CRT recorded by the two observers in forehead (mean +/- SD: 2.62 +/- 0.8 s and 1.88 +/- 0.57 s; p < 0.001), palm (2.99 +/- 0.61 s and 2.75 +/- 1.12 s; p < 0.05) and heel (3.08 +/- 0.79 s and 4.24 +/- 1.84 s; p < 0.001). Only CRT in chest (2.7 +/- 0.42 s and 2.62 +/- 0.74 s) produced no significant differences in the means with a statistically significant and clinically fair, but not strong, interobserver agreement (r = 0.4; p < 0.001). No significant associations occurred between CRT and sex or birth weight. The associations of chest CRT with age at assessment (r = -0.23; p < 0.01) and room temperature (r = 0.27; p < 0.01) were clinically not important. In conclusion, CRT in neonates needs to be validated further before it can be useful as a specific clinical sign of peripheral circulation.

21 keywords...

hide…