• U Boeken, P Feindt, T Petzold, M Klein, M Micek, U T Seyfert, E Mohan, H D Schulte, and E Gams.
• Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Heinrich Heine University Hospital, Düsseldorf, Germany.
• Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998 Dec 1;46(6):348-51.

BackgroundThe reasons for a systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) following ECC are not yet fully understood. Procalcitonin (PCT) blood levels may distinguish between bacterial infections and a non-bacterial systemic inflammation. We investigated the influence of ECC, ECC modified by application of aprotinin, systemic inflammation, and bacterial infection on the PCT values.Methods20 CABG patients were randomized and divided in two groups. Group A served as the control group, while group B perioperatively received a high dose of aprotinin. Blood samples for measurement of PCT were taken 6 times perioperatively. Furthermore, blood samples were taken from 20 preoperatively comparable patients who suffered from bacterial infection (n = 10) (group C) or a SIRS (n = 10) (group D) after ECC; in these groups PCT was determined daily after the onset of inflammation.ResultsThere was no significant elevation of PCT in group A or B at any time. In sepsis patients a significant elevation of PCT was seen, with the peak level of 18.6+/-6.3 ng/ml on the second day after diagnosis; the PCT level of SIRS patients remained constantly low (<0.9 ng/ml).ConclusionsIn this study it was demonstrated that ECC and the use of aprotinin did not have any influence on the secretion of PCT. A systemic bacterial infection caused a significant increase of PCT, whereas PCT values remained normal in case of a SIRS. So it seems to be possible to distinguish between a primary SIRS and a bacterial sepsis by means of PCT.

23 keywords...

hide…