-
Cardiology in review · May 2009
Review Comparative StudyComparison of endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a review.
- Maddalena Pizzirusso Duarte, Catherine T Maldjian, and Igor Laskowski.
- Department of Radiology, New York Medical College/Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, New York 10595, USA. duartem@wcmc.com
- Cardiol Rev. 2009 May 1;17(3):112-4.
AbstractThe purpose of this review is to highlight the indications, complications, and outcomes observed with endovascular or open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysms. We selected literature published during 2005 to 2008, encompassing a research period from 1987 to 2005 which compared these 2 techniques and followed various outcomes of morbidity and mortality.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.