• W Schwenk, G Brodner, E A Neugebauer, and Auftrag der PATHOS-Studiengruppe.
• Universitätsklinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Gefäss- und Thoraxchirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité Campus Mitte. wolfgang.schwenk@charite.de
• Zentralbl Chir. 2008 Jun 1;133(3):297-305.

BackgroundFrom 2004 to 2005, a survey concerning the structure and organisation of postoperative acute pain therapy (APT) was conducted in 1358 hospitals from 7 EU states.MethodsAnaesthesiologists, general and abdominal surgeons, orthopaedic / trauma surgeons, gynaecologists and ENT specialists were interviewed concerning: Education of medical and non-medical employees, patient information, protocols for acute pain therapy and methods of pain assessment.Results1558 questionnaires from 746 hospitals were returned, among them 516 questionnaires from Germany where surgeons were more often responsible for acute pain therapy (50 vs. 36 %, p < 0.05). A budget for APT existed in only 8 % of German hospitals (vs. 22 % of hospitals in other nations, p < 0.05). German surgeons were more often responsible for the APT education of nurses on the general ward (58 vs. 20 %, p < 0.05). Patient information about APT was more often presented in Germany in selected cases (45 vs. 23 %, p < 0.05), APT protocols were developed more often (42 vs. 30 %, p < 0.05) and the influence of APT on morbidity and mortality was judged to be higher by German physicians (p < 0.05 each) as compared to other nations. Nevertheless, postoperative pain was not assessed at all in 53 % of all German hospitals, and only in 25 % of the hospitals of other nations (p < 0.05).ConclusionFurther initiatives to improve postoperative acute pain therapy are urgently needed in all nations under evaluation. National measures in Germany have to take into account the specific problems identified in this large survey and should focus on the interests and needs of German surgeons.

30 keywords...

hide…