• Acta oto-laryngologica · Feb 2008

    Laryngeal fractures: clinical findings and considerations on suboptimal outcome.

    • Marko Juutilainen, Juha Vintturi, Soraya Robinson, Leif Bäck, Hannu Lehtonen, and Antti A Mäkitie.
    • Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
    • Acta Otolaryngol. 2008 Feb 1;128(2):213-8.

    ConclusionWe recommend early surgical exploration and fixation for patients with dislocated or comminuted laryngeal fractures to avoid long-term voice complications. One-third of 33 fracture patients rated their voice after the fracture had healed as fair but altered.ObjectivesTo examine the indications for and the outcome of surgical management in patients with laryngeal fractures.Patients And MethodsThe study was carried out in a tertiary care referral university hospital and was a retrospective study of case series. Thirty-three consecutive patients, aged 14-84 years, presented with various types of laryngeal fractures. Patients were staged according to the type of the fracture and surgical correction was performed when indicated. Voice outcome was documented and patients with subjectively suboptimal result were further evaluated by phoniatric specialist.ResultsIn all, 32 of 33 laryngeal fracture patients had blunt trauma and the main causative factors were sport injuries (39%) and physical assault (33%). All of the 33 laryngeal fracture patients had a good airway outcome. The subjective voice outcome was good for 20 (61%) and fair for 13 (39%) patients. The mean follow-up time was 39.5 months (range 2-114 months). In phoniatric evaluation most (six of eight) patients with fair voice outcome could not produce high pitched voices because of inability to stretch the vocal folds.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…