• Ann Acad Med Singap · Jan 2001

    Comparative Study

    A prospective evaluation of surgeon performed sonography as a screening test in blunt abdominal trauma.

    • E Foo, J W Su, D Menon, D Tan, and S T Chan.
    • Department of Surgery, Alexandra Hospital, 379 Alexandra Road, Singapore 159964.
    • Ann Acad Med Singap. 2001 Jan 1;30(1):11-4.

    IntroductionSonography has found a role in the evaluation of patients with abdominal injury. However, the accuracy of sonography as performed by non-radiologists remains controversial. This study aims to determine the accuracy of focused abdominal sonography for trauma when performed by surgeons.Materials And MethodOver a 1-year period, 48 patients with abdominal injury were initially evaluated for free intraperitoneal fluid by sonography. These tests were performed by 2 surgeons who had received instructions and performed a minimum of 30 examinations. Sonographic findings were then compared with other diagnostic modalities including computed tomography (CT) scan, diagnostic peritoneal lavage and exploratory laparotomy.ResultsThe sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy for sonography were found to be 0.86, 0.92, 0.89, 0.90 and 0.89, respectively. Although not specifically sought for, 2 cases of solid organ injury and 1 haemothorax, which were missed in initial examinations and X-rays, were detected on sonography.ConclusionIn conclusion, our initial experience suggests that local surgeons can perform a focused sonographic examination for trauma with acceptable accuracy. Although sonography lacks the sensitivity of diagnostic peritoneal lavage and the accuracy of CT scan, the diagnostic algorithm for abdominal trauma should include sonography as a screening test.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…