• Critical care medicine · Dec 1997

    Comparative Study

    Use of intratracheal pulmonary ventilation versus conventional ventilation in meconium aspiration syndrome in a newborn pig model.

    • H Handman, K Rais-Bahrami, O Rivera, W R Seale, and B L Short.
    • George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
    • Crit. Care Med. 1997 Dec 1;25(12):2025-30.

    ObjectiveTo determine whether intratracheal pulmonary ventilation (ITPV) allows for effective oxygenation and ventilation at lower mean airway pressures and peak inspiratory pressures than conventional ventilation in a piglet model of meconium aspiration syndrome.DesignProspective, interventional study.SettingThe animal research laboratory at Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC.SubjectsTwenty newborn piglets, 2 to 7 days of age, weighing 1.8 to 2.8 kg.InterventionAnimals were anesthetized, paralyzed, intubated, and ventilated. Femoral arterial and venous catheters were inserted; 5 mL/kg of 20% meconium in normal saline was instilled into the endotracheal tube. Animals were randomized to either ITPV or conventional ventilation, and settings were adjusted to maintain ideal blood gases, i.e., pH 7.35 to 7.45, PCO2 40 to 45 torr (5.3 to 6 kPa), PO2 80 to 100 torr (10.7 to 13.3 kPa), and SaO2 > or = 90%. Ventilatory settings were adjusted as needed to a maximum of: FIO2 1.0, peak inspiratory pressure 40 cm H2O, positive end-expiratory pressure 5 cm H2O, and respiratory rate 80 breaths/min.Measurements And Main ResultsArterial blood gases were taken every 30 mins for 4 hrs and ventilatory settings were adjusted to maintain optimal blood gases. Heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure, and arterial saturation were monitored continuously. The animals in the ITPV group had significantly lower peak inspiratory pressure at 1, 2, 3, and 4 hrs after meconium instillation (p < .018) and significantly lower mean airway pressure at 2, 3, and 4 hrs after meconium instillation (p < .03). The mean peak inspiratory pressure in the ITPV animals ranged from 17 +/- 2.7 cm H2O at baseline to 16.6 +/- 5.7 cm H2O at 4 hrs compared with 16.5 +/- 2.7 cm H2O at baseline to 31.8 +/- 9.1 cm H2O at 4 hrs in the conventionally ventilated animals (p < .04). The mean airway pressure ranged from 6.3 +/- 1.1 mm Hg at baseline to 6.8 +/- 2.5 mm Hg at 4 hrs in the ITPV group compared with 5.5 +/- 1.2 mm Hg at baseline to 10.7 +/- 3.4 mm Hg at 4 hrs in the conventional ventilation group (p < .03). The lungs of the ITPV animals were less hemorrhagic and had less pathologic evidence of injury than the lungs of the conventionally ventilated animals.ConclusionsThese results indicate that ITPV can be used to effectively ventilate and oxygenate piglets with meconium aspiration syndrome at lower mean airway pressures and peak inspiratory pressures than conventional ventilation. This lower pressure causes less injury to the lungs of the animals.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…