• J H Van der Walt, R K Webb, G A Osborne, C Morgan, and P Mackay.
• Department of Paediatric Anaesthesia, Women's and Children's Hospital, North Adelaide, S.A.
• Anaesth Intensive Care. 1993 Oct 1;21(5):650-2.

AbstractOf the first 2000 incidents reported to the Australian Incident Monitoring Study 120 (6%) occurred in the recovery room after general, regional or local anaesthesia. Over two thirds (69%) of these involved the respiratory system, 19% were cardiovascular, 3% involved the central nervous system and 9% were miscellaneous in nature. These recovery room incidents were associated with significantly more adverse outcomes (56%) than incidents in the operating theatre (24%). The types and relative frequencies of these recovery room incidents were similar to those of serious recovery complications in a recent analysis of closed malpractice claims; this suggests that incident monitoring may be useful in the study and prevention of recovery room complications. Over three quarters (77%) of all recovery incidents (and 88% of respiratory incidents) were detected clinically; the remainder were first detected by a monitor. A theoretical analysis showed that over 95% of respiratory events, had they been allowed to evolve, would have been detected by pulse oximetry before organ damage occurred, emphasising the potential importance of pulse oximetry in reducing adverse outcome from any complication in the recovery ward which might be "missed" by clinical observation. The findings of this study underline the importance of having an adequate number of trained recovery nursing staff supported by the availability of a pulse oximeter for each patient at least until the return of protective reflexes and the ability to maintain adequate arterial saturation has been established.

9 keywords...

hide…